Little Physical Attraction = Deal Breaker?
You're matched with a nice person, but you're not physically attracted to them. Are you shallow? Is this a deal breaker?
by eHarmony Staff
As human beings, we are made to feel physical attraction. It is one of our most powerful mate selection criteria. Much of eHarmony’s philosophy regarding relationships has to do with placing physical attraction lower on our list of selection criteria, because when looking at “long-term” relationship success, physical attraction doesn’t rank very high.
In other words, when talking to couples that have been successfully married for many years they rarely list “physical attraction” as one of the core issues that has led to their success.
In addition, it’s a sad fact that today in society people often use physical attraction as their “only” gauge of whether to pursue a relationship. This notion is reinforced constantly by our media and leads to large numbers of shallow, dysfunctional and ultimately failed relationships. Having said all that, we do believe that physical attraction is germane to a healthy, successful relationship and discourage relationships between two people who get along great, appear to be compatible and yet have no “spark.” Building a great relationship without the excitement and attraction that comes from Little Physical Attraction = Deal Breaker? is impossible.
Remember, a “great person” is not a “great person for you” unless they meet your needs and desires in a partner. You needn’t feel guilty about your lack of physical chemistry with a person. In fact, you’re acting compassionately by letting them know you’re not attracted, (gently, no need to be blunt here) so they can find someone who does find him or her physically appealing.
80 comments on
“Little Physical Attraction = Deal Breaker?”
Shallow is only an insult if you allow it to be.
If physical attraction being the most important thing to me makes me shallow, then I will gladly hit my head on the bottom of my own metaphorical swimming pool. I will take being happy with an attractive partner over being unhappy with an unattractive, anytime.
As long as there is physical attraction, other things can be negotiated.
- September 01, 2009 07:00 PM
I took a leap of faith when I made it to open communication with a woman who did not post her photo. After several phone calls she agreed to post her photo and said she didn't photograph well. The photo was at best average but her voice and personality were beautiful so I decided to meet her for lunch. When I met her for the first time I was floored by her looks. Whether or not it was from our conversations and emails that colored my perception, she was absolutely beautiful to me. The relationship did not last but I now at least read thru a profile without a photo before I close the match.
Nice....how not to "Shallow Hal" of you.
*wink* *grin*
Hoo Knew!
ichoosetosmile1968
- September 01, 2008 09:28 PM
Hi All,
I was married to a great guy for 10 years who when I first met him he didn't set off those "fireworks", years later I met him again and it wasn't his looks that captured me but his heart. We were married for 10 years and we were happy up until his passing in 1996.
I have since been out with men who I was physically attracted to and then nothing came of the relationship because they did not share the same values, or wanted the same things in life that I do.
Physical attraction is one thing but should not be the be all and end all, afterall good looks can fade but a warm giving heart does not.
Best of luck in our search for everlasting love and happiness.
[img]library/editor/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-smile.gif[/img]
Not an Advice member? Sign up to contribute to the discussion.
Create an account above to save and post your reply. This information is private: only your screen name will be visible to other Advice members.
Advice members, log in to post your reply.
eHarmony account holders: your signup information will not work in the Advice Community. You must create an Advice screen name by using the sign-up form to the right.
Recent comments on this article
Read all comments